[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210429144244.GE1981@kadam>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:42:44 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] staging: fbtft: Don't spam logs when probe is
deferred
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 04:04:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> @@ -75,20 +75,16 @@ static int fbtft_request_one_gpio(struct fbtft_par *par,
> struct gpio_desc **gpiop)
> {
> struct device *dev = par->info->device;
> - int ret = 0;
>
> *gpiop = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, name, index,
> GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> - if (IS_ERR(*gpiop)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(*gpiop);
> - dev_err(dev,
> - "Failed to request %s GPIO: %d\n", name, ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(*gpiop))
> + dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(*gpiop), "Failed to request %s GPIO\n", name);
This should be a return statement:
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(*gpiop), "Failed to request %s GPIO\n", name);
> +
> fbtft_par_dbg(DEBUG_REQUEST_GPIOS, par, "%s: '%s' GPIO\n",
> __func__, name);
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists