lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCDQeTU0ss=oNmjX78MPyNZmmCt-haojNNcQqkjJUmJYKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Apr 2021 23:30:58 +0200
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc:     khilman@...libre.com, jbrunet@...libre.com,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: meson-sm1: add Banana PI BPI-M5 board dts

Hi Neil,

thanks for adding support for the BPI-M5!
I had this on my TODO-list for a long time but didn't have enough time
so far. so it's great to see this patch now :-)

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:04 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> wrote:
[...]
> +       adc_keys {
> +               compatible = "adc-keys";
> +               io-channels = <&saradc 2>;
> +               io-channel-names = "buttons";
> +               keyup-threshold-microvolt = <1800000>;
> +
> +               button-onoff {
maybe just "key" (as you used below for SW1)?

> +                       label = "SW3";
> +                       linux,code = <BTN_3>;
> +                       press-threshold-microvolt = <1700000>;
> +               };
> +       };

> +       /* TOFIX: handle CVBS_DET on SARADC channel 0 */
it's great to see that after many years at least some boards finally
can detect whether the CVBS connector is plugged it

> +       memory@0 {
> +               device_type = "memory";
> +               reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x40000000>;
> +       };
note to self: u-boot will update this from 1GiB to 4GiB

> +       flash_1v8: regulator-flash_1v8 {
> +               compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +               regulator-name = "FLASH_1V8";
BPI-M5-SCH-V10-Release.pdf schematics are calling this EMMC_1V8. I
suggest to use that name so it's easier to compare this with the
schematics in the future

> +               regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> +               regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> +               vin-supply = <&vddao_3v3>;
> +               regulator-always-on;
> +       };
> +
> +       dc_in: regulator-dc_in {
> +               compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +               regulator-name = "5V";
maybe use "DC_IN" here as well so the node-name matches what we see in
userspace/kernel logs?

> +       vddcpu: regulator-vddcpu {
> +               /*
> +                * SY8120B1ABC DC/DC Regulator.
> +                */
> +               compatible = "pwm-regulator";
> +
> +               regulator-name = "VDDCPU";
> +               regulator-min-microvolt = <721000>;
> +               regulator-max-microvolt = <1022000>;
the vendor .dts has:
  regulator-min-microvolt = <690000>;
  regulator-max-microvolt = <1050000>;
which also matches meson-sm1-sei610.dts (which uses the same regulator IC)

[...]
> +&ethmac {
> +       pinctrl-0 = <&eth_pins>, <&eth_rgmii_pins>;
> +       pinctrl-names = "default";
> +       status = "okay";
> +       phy-mode = "rgmii";
> +       phy-handle = <&external_phy>;
> +       amlogic,tx-delay-ns = <2>;
I haven't checked their u-boot code but some of the newer Amlogic BSPs
seem to let the PHY add the TX delay (which is also what the netdev
maintainers recommend)
that can be achieved by setting:
  phy-mode = "rgmii-txid";
and deleting the "amlogic,tx-delay-ns" property

> +&gpio {
> +       gpio-line-names =
> +               /* GPIOZ */
> +               "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "",
GPIOZ_0 to GPIOZ_15:
- ETH_MDIO
- ETH_MDC
- ETH_RXCLK
- ETH_RX_DV
- ETH_RXD0
- ETH_RXD1
- ETH_RXD2
- ETH_RXD3
- ETH_TXCLK
- ETH_TXEN
- ETH_TXD0
- ETH_TXD1
- ETH_TXD2
- ETH_TXD3
- ETH_INTR
- ETH_NRST

> +               /* GPIOH */
> +               "", "", "", "", "",
GPIOH_0 to GPIOH_4:
- HDMI_SDA
- HDMI_SCL
- HDMI_HPD
- HDMI_CEC
- VL-RST_N

> +               "CON1-P36", /* GPIOH_5 */
GPIOH_6 to GPIOH_8:
- VL-PWREN
- WiFi_3V3_1V8
- TFLASH_VDD_EN

> +               /* BOOT */
> +               "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "",
> +               "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "",
BOOT_0 to BOOT_13:
- eMMC_D0
- eMMC_D1
- eMMC_D2
- eMMC_D3
- eMMC_D4
- eMMC_D5
- eMMC_D6
- eMMC_D7
- eMMC_CLK
- (BOOT_9 is unused)
- eMMC_CMD
- (BOOT_11 is unused)
- eMMC_RST#
- eMMC_DS

> +               /* GPIOC */
> +               "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "",
GPIOC_0 to GPIOC_7:
- SD_D0_B
- SD_D1_B
- SD_D2_B
- SD_D3_B
- SD_CLK_B
- SD_CMD_B
- CARD_EN_DET
- (GPIOC_7 is unused)


> +&gpio_ao {
> +       gpio-line-names =
> +               /* GPIOAO */
> +               "DEBUG TX", /* GPIOAO_0 */
> +               "DEBUG RX", /* GPIOAO_1 */
> +               "SYS_LED2", /* GPIOAO_2 */
> +               "UPDATE_KEY", /* GPIOAO_3 */
> +               "CON1-P40", /* GPIOAO_4 */
> +               "",
GPIOAO_5 is IR_IN

> +               "TF_3V3N_1V8_EN", /* GPIOAO_6 */
> +               "CON1-P35", /* GPIOAO_7 */
> +               "CON1-P12", /* GPIOAO_8 */
> +               "CON1-P37", /* GPIOAO_9 */
> +               "CON1-P38", /* GPIOAO_10 */
> +               "SYS_LED", /* GPIOAO_11 */
> +               /* GPIOE */
> +               "", "", "";
GPIOE_0 to GPIOOE_2:
- VDDEE_PWM
- VDDCPU_PWM
- TF_PWR_EN

> +&usb2_phy0 {
> +       phy-supply = <&dc_in>;
> +};
> +
> +&usb2_phy1 {
> +       /* Enable the hub which is connected to this port */
> +       phy-supply = <&vl_pwr_en>;
> +};
I think technically we'd need to use AVDD18_USB here (that said, I
chose the same approach as you are using here before..)
USB bus devices (AFAIK) still need to be detected before any
device-tree properties can be applied and there's (again AFAIK) still
no pwrseq concept.
so I guess for now this is the way to go as there's enough comments
about it in your patch


Best regards,
Martin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ