lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 29 Apr 2021 22:48:15 +0000
From:   "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "tiantao (H)" <tiantao6@...ilicon.com>,
        "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Valentin Schneider" <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] CPU, NUMA topology ABIs: clarify the overflow issue
 of sysfs pagebuf



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Hansen [mailto:dave.hansen@...el.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2021 10:39 AM
> To: Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>; tiantao (H)
> <tiantao6@...ilicon.com>; corbet@....net; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Rafael J.
> Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>; Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>; Valentin
> Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>; Dave Hansen
> <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>; Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] CPU, NUMA topology ABIs: clarify the overflow issue
> of sysfs pagebuf
> 
> On 4/29/21 3:32 PM, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
> > $ strace numactl --hardware  2>&1 | grep cpu
> > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/devices/system/cpu",
> > O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
> > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpumap", O_RDONLY) = 3
> > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/devices/system/node/node1/cpumap", O_RDONLY) = 3
> > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/devices/system/node/node2/cpumap", O_RDONLY) = 3
> > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/devices/system/node/node3/cpumap", O_RDONLY) = 3
> >
> > If we move to binary, it means we have to change those applications.
> 
> I thought Greg was saying to using a sysfs binary attribute using
> something like like sysfs_create_bin_file().  Those don't have the
> PAGE_SIZE limitation.  But, there's also nothing to keep us from spewing
> nice human-readable text via the "binary" file.
> 
> We don't need to change the file format, just the internal kernel API
> that we produce the files with.

Dave, thanks for clarification. Sounds a way to go.

Barry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ