[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIuxy9OtlNzq7zwM@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:29:15 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@...omium.org>,
Eddie Hung <eddie.hung@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: xhci-mtk: use bitfield instead of bool
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 03:15:30PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> Use bitfield instead of bool in struct
That says what you did, but not why you did it.
Why?
>
> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c | 2 --
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.h | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c
> index b2058b3bc834..2548976bcf05 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c
> @@ -495,8 +495,6 @@ static int xhci_mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto put_usb2_hcd;
> }
> mtk->has_ippc = true;
> - } else {
> - mtk->has_ippc = false;
Why did you remove this chunk? That is not described in the changelog
at all.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists