[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAERHkrtGSMiO30XAneNWY_ccGu1rqkAOCgRQnCgbSh78A_mvKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:26:55 +0800
From: Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@...il.com>
To: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@...italocean.com>
Cc: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
"Hyser,Chris" <chris.hyser@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/19] sched: Prepare for Core-wide rq->lock
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 5:09 AM Don Hiatt <dhiatt@...italocean.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 1:48 PM Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 9:41 AM Don Hiatt <dhiatt@...italocean.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm still seeing hard lockups while repeatedly setting cookies on qemu
> > > processes even with
> > > the updated patch. If there is any debug you'd like me to turn on,
> > > just let me know.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > don
> >
> > Thanks for the added context on your repro configuration. In addition
> > to the updated patch from earlier, could you try the modification to
> > double_rq_lock() from
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CABk29NuS-B3n4sbmavo0NDA1OCCsz6Zf2VDjjFQvAxBMQoJ_Lg@mail.gmail.com
> > ? I have a feeling this is what's causing your lockup.
> >
> > Best,
> > Josh
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> I've been running Aubrey+Peter's patch (attached) for almost 5 hours
> and haven't had a single issue. :)
>
> I'm running a set-cookie script every 5 seconds on the two VMs (each
> vm is running
> 'sysbench --threads=1 --time=0 cpu run' to generate some load in the vm) and
> I'm running two of the same sysbench runs on the HV while setting cookies
> every 5 seconds.
>
> Unless I jinxed us it looks like a great fix. :)
>
> Let me know if there is anything else you'd like me to try. I'm going
> to leave the tests running
> and see what happens. I update with what I find.
>
This sounds great, Thanks Don.
However, I guess we have the same problem in _double_lock_balance(), which
needs to be fixed as well.
I or Josh can make a better patch for this after Peter's comments.
Thanks,
-Aubrey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists