[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIvQoG52Vk96DJQ/@google.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:40:48 +0000
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@...bug.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Fix out-of-bound access in uclamp
On Friday 30 Apr 2021 at 10:49:50 (+0200), Vincent Guittot wrote:
> 20 buckets is probably not the best example because of the rounding of
> the division. With 16 buckets, each bucket should be exactly 64 steps
> large except the last one which will have 65 steps because of the
> value 1024. With your change, buckets will be 65 large and the last
> one will be only 49 large
OK, so what do you think of this?
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index c5fb230dc604..dceeb5821797 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -920,14 +920,14 @@ static struct uclamp_se uclamp_default[UCLAMP_CNT];
*/
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_uclamp_used);
-#define UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / UCLAMP_BUCKETS + 1)
+#define UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE, UCLAMP_BUCKETS)
#define for_each_clamp_id(clamp_id) \
for ((clamp_id) = 0; (clamp_id) < UCLAMP_CNT; (clamp_id)++)
static inline unsigned int uclamp_bucket_id(unsigned int clamp_value)
{
- return clamp_value / UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA;
+ return min(clamp_value / UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA, UCLAMP_BUCKETS - 1);
}
static inline unsigned int uclamp_none(enum uclamp_id clamp_id)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists