[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIv1HSXC4kKa+jHc@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:16:29 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 075/190] Revert "gma/gma500: fix a memory disclosure bug
due to uninitialized bytes"
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:23:01PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/cdv_intel_display.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/cdv_intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/cdv_intel_display.c
> > index 5d3302249779..f89c2088dc2d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/cdv_intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/cdv_intel_display.c
> > @@ -405,8 +405,6 @@ static bool cdv_intel_find_dp_pll(const struct gma_limit_t *limit,
> > struct gma_crtc *gma_crtc = to_gma_crtc(crtc);
> > struct gma_clock_t clock;
> >
> > - memset(&clock, 0, sizeof(clock));
> > -
> > switch (refclk) {
> > case 27000:
> > if (target < 200000) {
>
> Original description is correct, we are returning with .vco and .dot
> unitialized which is at least very very ugly, so we should keep the
> memset and not revert this.
Good point, revert now dropped, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists