[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIv4owS5VxkadjoL@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:31:31 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@....com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/6] net: add generic selftest support
> Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 3e1e58d64c3d0a67 ("net: add
> generic selftest support") upstream.
>
> > --- a/net/Kconfig
> > +++ b/net/Kconfig
> > @@ -429,6 +429,10 @@ config GRO_CELLS
> > config SOCK_VALIDATE_XMIT
> > bool
> >
> > +config NET_SELFTESTS
> > + def_tristate PHYLIB
>
> Why does this default to enabled if PHYLIB=y?
> Usually we allow the user to make selftests modular, independent of the
> feature under test, but I may misunderstand the purpose of this test.
Maybe there is a misunderstanding here with 'selftest'. The name page
for ethtool(1) says:
-t --test
Executes adapter selftest on the specified network device. Pos‐
sible test modes are:
offline
Perform full set of tests, possibly interrupting normal op‐
eration during the tests,
online Perform limited set of tests, not interrupting normal opera‐
tion,
external_lb
Perform full set of tests, as for offline, and additionally
an external-loopback test.
This feature has nothing to do with tools/testing/selftests. It
predates that by decades.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists