[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210430123408.GD53304@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:34:08 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>, will@...nel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, suzuki.poulose@....com,
julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm_pmu: Fix write counter incorrect in ARMv7 big-endian
mode
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 09:26:59AM +0800, Yang Jihong wrote:
> Commit 3a95200d3f89a ("arm_pmu: Change API to support 64bit counter values")
> changes the input "value" type from 32-bit to 64-bit,
> which introduces the following problem:
> ARMv7 PMU counters is 32-bit width, in big-endian mode, write counter uses
> high 32-bit, which writes an incorrect value.
It might be worth noting that the reason for this is that when a 64-bit
value is split across two 32-bit registers, the high/low halves are
split to match how LDRD would load a 64-bit quantity (and so differs
across big/little endian), but the "r" constraint consistently uses the
first of the two regiseters.
Given that, this patch makes sense to me (and I didn't spot any related
issues), so:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Will, I assume you'll pick this up.
Mark.
>
> Before:
>
> Performance counter stats for 'ls':
>
> 2.22 msec task-clock # 0.675 CPUs utilized
> 0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec
> 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec
> 49 page-faults # 0.022 M/sec
> 2150476593 cycles # 966.663 GHz
> 2148588788 instructions # 1.00 insn per cycle
> 2147745484 branches # 965435.074 M/sec
> 2147508540 branch-misses # 99.99% of all branches
>
> None of the above hw event counters are correct.
>
> Solution:
>
> "value" forcibly converted to 32-bit type before being written to PMU register.
>
> After:
>
> Performance counter stats for 'ls':
>
> 2.09 msec task-clock # 0.681 CPUs utilized
> 0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec
> 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec
> 46 page-faults # 0.022 M/sec
> 2807301 cycles # 1.344 GHz
> 1060159 instructions # 0.38 insn per cycle
> 250496 branches # 119.914 M/sec
> 23192 branch-misses # 9.26% of all branches
>
> Fixes: 3a95200d3f89a ("arm_pmu: Change API to support 64bit counter values")
> Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
> index 2924d7910b10..eb2190477da1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
> @@ -773,10 +773,10 @@ static inline void armv7pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
> pr_err("CPU%u writing wrong counter %d\n",
> smp_processor_id(), idx);
> } else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER) {
> - asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : : "r" (value));
> + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : : "r" ((u32)value));
> } else {
> armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx);
> - asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : : "r" (value));
> + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : : "r" ((u32)value));
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.30.GIT
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists