lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:29:40 -0600
From:   Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:     Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
Cc:     <cohuck@...hat.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [Question] Indefinitely block in the host when remove the PF
 driver

On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:57:47 +0800
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com> wrote:

> When I try to remove the PF driver in the host, the process will be blocked
> if the related VF of the device is added in the Qemu as an iEP.
> 
> here's what I got in the host:
> 
> [root@...alhost 0000:75:00.0]# rmmod hisi_zip
> [99760.571352] vfio-pci 0000:75:00.1: Relaying device request to user (#0)
> [99862.992099] vfio-pci 0000:75:00.1: Relaying device request to user (#10)
> [...]
> 
> and in the Qemu:
> 
> estuary:/$ lspci -tv
> -[0000:00]-+-00.0  Device 1b36:0008
>            +-01.0  Device 1af4:1000
>            +-02.0  Device 1af4:1009
>            \-03.0  Device 19e5:a251 <----- the related VF device
> estuary:/$ qemu-system-aarch64: warning: vfio 0000:75:00.1: Bus 'pcie.0' does not support hotplugging
> qemu-system-aarch64: warning: vfio 0000:75:00.1: Bus 'pcie.0' does not support hotplugging
> qemu-system-aarch64: warning: vfio 0000:75:00.1: Bus 'pcie.0' does not support hotplugging
> qemu-system-aarch64: warning: vfio 0000:75:00.1: Bus 'pcie.0' does not support hotplugging
> [...]
> 
> The rmmod process will be blocked until I kill the Qemu process. That's the only way if I
> want to end the rmmod.
> 
> So my question is: is such block reasonable? If the VF devcie is occupied or doesn't
> support hotplug in the Qemu, shouldn't we fail the rmmod and return something like -EBUSY
> rather than make the host blocked indefinitely?

Where would we return -EBUSY?  pci_driver.remove() returns void.
Without blocking, I think our only option would be to kill the user
process.
 
> Add the VF under a pcie root port will avoid this. Is it encouraged to always
> add the VF under a pcie root port rather than directly add it as an iEP?

Releasing a device via the vfio request interrupt is always a
cooperative process currently, the VM needs to be configured such that
the device is capable of being unplugged and the guest needs to respond
to the ejection request.  Thanks,

Alex

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ