linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Use might

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YIxBfNnwA/7nEenj@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date:   Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:42:20 +0200
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Use might_alloc()

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 12:31:27AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Bernard,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
> [also build test ERROR on v5.12 next-20210429]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Bernard-Zhao/drm-i915-Use-might_alloc/20210429-104516
> base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
> config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-kselftests (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/9fbd0c1741ce06241105d753ff3432ab55f3e94a
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review Bernard-Zhao/drm-i915-Use-might_alloc/20210429-104516
>         git checkout 9fbd0c1741ce06241105d753ff3432ab55f3e94a
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make W=1 W=1 ARCH=x86_64 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c: In function '__i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence':
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c:344:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'might_alloc'; did you mean 'might_lock'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      344 |  might_alloc(gfp);
>          |  ^~~~~~~~~~~
>          |  might_lock
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

I think you're missing an include or something. The other patch you've
done seems good, I queued that up in drm-intel-gt-next for 5.14.

Thanks, Daniel

> 
> 
> vim +344 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c
> 
>    335	
>    336	static int __i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence(struct i915_sw_fence *fence,
>    337						  struct i915_sw_fence *signaler,
>    338						  wait_queue_entry_t *wq, gfp_t gfp)
>    339	{
>    340		unsigned int pending;
>    341		unsigned long flags;
>    342	
>    343		debug_fence_assert(fence);
>  > 344		might_alloc(gfp);
>    345	
>    346		if (i915_sw_fence_done(signaler)) {
>    347			i915_sw_fence_set_error_once(fence, signaler->error);
>    348			return 0;
>    349		}
>    350	
>    351		debug_fence_assert(signaler);
>    352	
>    353		/* The dependency graph must be acyclic. */
>    354		if (unlikely(i915_sw_fence_check_if_after(fence, signaler)))
>    355			return -EINVAL;
>    356	
>    357		pending = I915_SW_FENCE_FLAG_FENCE;
>    358		if (!wq) {
>    359			wq = kmalloc(sizeof(*wq), gfp);
>    360			if (!wq) {
>    361				if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
>    362					return -ENOMEM;
>    363	
>    364				i915_sw_fence_wait(signaler);
>    365				i915_sw_fence_set_error_once(fence, signaler->error);
>    366				return 0;
>    367			}
>    368	
>    369			pending |= I915_SW_FENCE_FLAG_ALLOC;
>    370		}
>    371	
>    372		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wq->entry);
>    373		wq->flags = pending;
>    374		wq->func = i915_sw_fence_wake;
>    375		wq->private = fence;
>    376	
>    377		i915_sw_fence_await(fence);
>    378	
>    379		spin_lock_irqsave(&signaler->wait.lock, flags);
>    380		if (likely(!i915_sw_fence_done(signaler))) {
>    381			__add_wait_queue_entry_tail(&signaler->wait, wq);
>    382			pending = 1;
>    383		} else {
>    384			i915_sw_fence_wake(wq, 0, signaler->error, NULL);
>    385			pending = 0;
>    386		}
>    387		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&signaler->wait.lock, flags);
>    388	
>    389		return pending;
>    390	}
>    391	
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org



-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch