[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbZxauBFLvR_MMx4WD+K6DftK19Fivt_mkE=+Xr2EPUvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 13:59:06 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@...el.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/20] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Break GPIO and
MIPI-to-eDP bridge into sub-drivers
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 6:59 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> Let's use the newly minted aux bus to break up the driver into sub
> drivers. We're not doing a full breakup here: all the code is still in
> the same file and remains largely untouched. The big goal here of
> using sub-drivers is to allow part of our code to finish probing even
> if some other code needs to defer. This can solve some chicken-and-egg
> problems. Specifically:
> - In commit 48834e6084f1 ("drm/panel-simple: Support hpd-gpios for
> delaying prepare()") we had to add a bit of a hack to simpel-panel
> to support HPD showing up late. We can get rid of that hack now
> since the GPIO part of our driver can finish probing early.
> - We have a desire to expose our DDC bus to simple-panel (and perhaps
> to a backlight driver?). That will end up with the same
> chicken-and-egg problem. A future patch to move this to a sub-driver
> will fix it.
> - If/when we support the PWM functionality present in the bridge chip
> for a backlight we'll end up with another chicken-and-egg
> problem. If we allow the PWM to be a sub-driver too then it solves
> this problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v5:
> - Fix module compile problems (Bjorn + kbuild bot)
> - Remove useless MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (Bjorn).
This is generally a good idea. I have no idea when to use
auxbus or MFD but I trust that you researched that so:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists