[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjBSomE81D=dXN5Z1r_qTLDeKfOzXH4T+mPK6AeSWhW0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 15:49:43 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] integrity subsystem updates for v5.13
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 6:47 AM Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> In addition to loading the kernel module signing key onto the builtin
> keyring, load it onto the IMA keyring as well.
This clashed pretty badly with the other cert changes.
I think the end result looks nice and clean (the cert updates mesh
well with the _intention_ of your code, just not with the
implementation), but you should really double-check that I didn't mess
anything up in the merge and whatever test-case you have for IMA still
works.
I only verified that the kernel module signing key still works for
modules - no IMA test-case.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists