lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgdUMt_n84mq93LZKA6jOGqZpD+=KeVzA3YmvJ6=JPyhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 2 May 2021 09:12:37 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tom Stellard <tstellar@...hat.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
        Serge Guelton <sguelton@...hat.com>,
        Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@...illa.com>
Subject: Re: Very slow clang kernel config ..

On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 2:31 AM Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> The biggest advantage of shared libraries is that they enable
> distributions to provide security fixes.

Adrian - you're ignoring the real argument, to the point that the
above is basically a lie.

The argument was never that things like libc or the core GUI libraries
shouldn't be shared.

The argument was that the "one-off" libraries shouldn't be shared.

Things very much like libLLVM.so.

Or things like "libdivecomputer.so". You probably have never ever
heard of that library, have you? It's used by one single project, that
project isn't even in Fedora, but when we tried to make an rpm for it,
people complained because the Fedora rules said it needed to use
shared libraries.

So the whole notion that "shared libraries are good and required by
default" is pure and utter garbage. It's simply not true.

And no, it really didn't become any more true due to "security fixes".
Your argument is a red herring.

            Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ