linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] pseries/drmem: update LMBs after LPM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bdc510ff-f9f6-b032-0f0d-52a274fb9dab@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 May 2021 13:44:08 -0700
From:   Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org
Cc:     nathanl@...ux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pseries/drmem: update LMBs after LPM

On 5/3/21 10:28 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> Le 01/05/2021 à 01:58, Tyrel Datwyler a écrit :
>> On 4/30/21 9:13 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>>> Le 29/04/2021 à 21:12, Tyrel Datwyler a écrit :
>>>> On 4/29/21 3:27 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>>>> Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com> writes:
>>>>>

Snip

>>
>> As of today I don't have a problem with your patch. This was more of me pointing
>> out things that I think are currently wrong with our memory hotplug
>> implementation, and that we need to take a long hard look at it down the road.
> 
> I do agree, there is a lot of odd things there to address in this area.
> If you're ok with that patch, do you mind to add a reviewed-by?
> 

Can you send a v4 with the fix for the duplicate update included?

-Tyrel