[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210503205835.1370850-2-dlatypov@google.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 13:58:35 -0700
From: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To: brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: npache@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
---
v1 -> v2: no change. Might make a v3 if we want to rename the
file/config options to make it match.
---
lib/Kconfig.debug | 5 +-
lib/test_list_sort.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++--------------------------
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 678c13967580..5553508080db 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -2047,8 +2047,9 @@ config LKDTM
Documentation/fault-injection/provoke-crashes.rst
config TEST_LIST_SORT
- tristate "Linked list sorting test"
- depends on DEBUG_KERNEL || m
+ tristate "Linked list sorting test" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ depends on KUNIT
+ default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
help
Enable this to turn on 'list_sort()' function test. This test is
executed only once during system boot (so affects only boot time),
diff --git a/lib/test_list_sort.c b/lib/test_list_sort.c
index 00daaf23316f..ade7a1ea0c8e 100644
--- a/lib/test_list_sort.c
+++ b/lib/test_list_sort.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
-#define pr_fmt(fmt) "list_sort_test: " fmt
+#include <kunit/test.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/list_sort.h>
@@ -23,68 +23,52 @@ struct debug_el {
struct list_head list;
unsigned int poison2;
int value;
- unsigned serial;
+ unsigned int serial;
};
-/* Array, containing pointers to all elements in the test list */
-static struct debug_el **elts __initdata;
-
-static int __init check(struct debug_el *ela, struct debug_el *elb)
+static void check(struct kunit *test, struct debug_el *ela, struct debug_el *elb)
{
- if (ela->serial >= TEST_LIST_LEN) {
- pr_err("error: incorrect serial %d\n", ela->serial);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- if (elb->serial >= TEST_LIST_LEN) {
- pr_err("error: incorrect serial %d\n", elb->serial);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- if (elts[ela->serial] != ela || elts[elb->serial] != elb) {
- pr_err("error: phantom element\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- if (ela->poison1 != TEST_POISON1 || ela->poison2 != TEST_POISON2) {
- pr_err("error: bad poison: %#x/%#x\n",
- ela->poison1, ela->poison2);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- if (elb->poison1 != TEST_POISON1 || elb->poison2 != TEST_POISON2) {
- pr_err("error: bad poison: %#x/%#x\n",
- elb->poison1, elb->poison2);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- return 0;
+ struct debug_el **elts = test->priv;
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_LT_MSG(test, ela->serial, (unsigned int)TEST_LIST_LEN, "incorrect serial");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_LT_MSG(test, elb->serial, (unsigned int)TEST_LIST_LEN, "incorrect serial");
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, elts[ela->serial], ela, "phantom element");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, elts[elb->serial], elb, "phantom element");
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, ela->poison1, TEST_POISON1, "bad poison");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, ela->poison2, TEST_POISON2, "bad poison");
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, elb->poison1, TEST_POISON1, "bad poison");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, elb->poison2, TEST_POISON2, "bad poison");
}
-static int __init cmp(void *priv, const struct list_head *a,
- const struct list_head *b)
+/* `priv` is the test pointer so check() can fail the test if the list is invalid. */
+static int cmp(void *priv, const struct list_head *a, const struct list_head *b)
{
struct debug_el *ela, *elb;
ela = container_of(a, struct debug_el, list);
elb = container_of(b, struct debug_el, list);
- check(ela, elb);
+ check(priv, ela, elb);
return ela->value - elb->value;
}
-static int __init list_sort_test(void)
+static void list_sort_test(struct kunit *test)
{
- int i, count = 1, err = -ENOMEM;
- struct debug_el *el;
+ int i, count = 1;
+ struct debug_el *el, **elts;
struct list_head *cur;
LIST_HEAD(head);
- pr_debug("start testing list_sort()\n");
-
- elts = kcalloc(TEST_LIST_LEN, sizeof(*elts), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!elts)
- return err;
+ elts = kunit_kcalloc(test, TEST_LIST_LEN, sizeof(*elts), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, elts);
+ test->priv = elts;
for (i = 0; i < TEST_LIST_LEN; i++) {
- el = kmalloc(sizeof(*el), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!el)
- goto exit;
+ el = kunit_kmalloc(test, sizeof(*el), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, el);
/* force some equivalencies */
el->value = prandom_u32() % (TEST_LIST_LEN / 3);
@@ -95,55 +79,44 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void)
list_add_tail(&el->list, &head);
}
- list_sort(NULL, &head, cmp);
+ list_sort(test, &head, cmp);
- err = -EINVAL;
for (cur = head.next; cur->next != &head; cur = cur->next) {
struct debug_el *el1;
int cmp_result;
- if (cur->next->prev != cur) {
- pr_err("error: list is corrupted\n");
- goto exit;
- }
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, cur->next->prev, cur,
+ "list is corrupted");
- cmp_result = cmp(NULL, cur, cur->next);
- if (cmp_result > 0) {
- pr_err("error: list is not sorted\n");
- goto exit;
- }
+ cmp_result = cmp(test, cur, cur->next);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG(test, cmp_result, 0, "list is not sorted");
el = container_of(cur, struct debug_el, list);
el1 = container_of(cur->next, struct debug_el, list);
- if (cmp_result == 0 && el->serial >= el1->serial) {
- pr_err("error: order of equivalent elements not "
- "preserved\n");
- goto exit;
+ if (cmp_result == 0) {
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG(test, el->serial, el1->serial,
+ "order of equivalent elements not preserved");
}
- if (check(el, el1)) {
- pr_err("error: element check failed\n");
- goto exit;
- }
+ check(test, el, el1);
count++;
}
- if (head.prev != cur) {
- pr_err("error: list is corrupted\n");
- goto exit;
- }
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, head.prev, cur, "list is corrupted");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, count, TEST_LIST_LEN,
+ "list length changed after sorting!");
+}
- if (count != TEST_LIST_LEN) {
- pr_err("error: bad list length %d", count);
- goto exit;
- }
+static struct kunit_case list_sort_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(list_sort_test),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite list_sort_suite = {
+ .name = "list_sort",
+ .test_cases = list_sort_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(&list_sort_suite);
- err = 0;
-exit:
- for (i = 0; i < TEST_LIST_LEN; i++)
- kfree(elts[i]);
- kfree(elts);
- return err;
-}
-module_init(list_sort_test);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--
2.31.1.527.g47e6f16901-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists