[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YI/KSfWuGLhPnilr@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 12:02:49 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.comi>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] sched/fair: Consider SMT in ASYM_PACKING load
balance
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 07:04:35PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> @@ -8507,6 +8616,18 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
> if (!sgs->sum_h_nr_running)
> return false;
>
> + /*
> + * @sg may have been tentatively classified as group_asym_packing.
> + * Now that we have sufficient information about @sds.local, reassess
> + * if asym packing migration can be done. Reclassify @sg. The only
> + * possible results are group_has_spare and group_fully_busy.
> + */
> + if (sgs->group_type == group_asym_packing &&
> + !asym_can_pull_tasks(env->dst_cpu, sds, sgs, sg)) {
> + sgs->group_asym_packing = 0;
> + sgs->group_type = group_classify(env->sd->imbalance_pct, sg, sgs);
> + }
So if this really is all about not having sds.local in
update_sd_lb_stats(), then that seems fixable. Let me haz a try.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists