[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210503101650.GC6621@amd>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 12:16:50 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Juergen Borleis <jbe@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: trigger/tty: Use led_set_brightness() to support
all use cases
On Mon 2021-05-03 11:25:42, Juergen Borleis wrote:
> Using led_set_brightness_sync() only works for LEDs which are connected
> via some kind of external bus like I²C or SPI. But it doesn't work for
> the simple use case of directly connected LEDs via GPIOs.
Really? I'd need to check.
> Because this function only honors the led_classdev::brightness_set_blocking
> callback. But the LED-GPIO driver registers the
> led_classdev::brightness_set member if the GPIO can be modified directly
> and thus, TTY triggers fail silently with -ENOTSUPP.
>
> With the previously used led_set_brightness() it works for both use cases.
> This function first checks for the simple case where the GPIO can be changed
> without additional overhead, and if it fails, does the modification via a
> workqueue.
Yeah, but that is not what we want. We are already running in the
workqueue.
We really should have a API that can be called from process context,
and just simply sets the brightness.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists