[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <75e8a4f70dfbbfa4cf5b923ab0ac92768e1e2de5.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 20:12:49 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>, mjg59@...gle.com
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/12] evm: Allow xattr/attr operations for portable
signatures
Hi Roberto,
> diff --git a/include/linux/integrity.h b/include/linux/integrity.h
> index 2271939c5c31..2ea0f2f65ab6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/integrity.h
> +++ b/include/linux/integrity.h
>
> @@ -238,9 +241,12 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry,
> break;
> }
>
> - if (rc)
> - evm_status = (rc == -ENODATA) ?
> - INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS : INTEGRITY_FAIL;
> + if (rc) {
> + evm_status = INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS;
> + if (rc != -ENODATA)
> + evm_status = evm_immutable ?
> + INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE : INTEGRITY_FAIL;
The original code made an exception for the -ENODATA case. Using a
ternary operator made sense in that case. Inverting the test makes
the code less readable. Please use the standard "if" statement
instead.
thanks,
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists