[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210503160841.2juynuimujnaajad@revolver>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 16:08:47 +0000
From: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>
To: Michel Lespinasse <michel@...pinasse.org>
CC: "maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org" <maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken.cr@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/94] mm: Add vma_lookup()
* Michel Lespinasse <michel@...pinasse.org> [210501 01:04]:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 03:35:43PM +0000, Liam Howlett wrote:
> > Many places in the kernel use find_vma() to get a vma and then check the
> > start address of the vma to ensure the next vma was not returned.
> >
> > Other places use the find_vma_intersection() call with add, addr + 1 as
> > the range; looking for just the vma at a specific address.
> >
> > The third use of find_vma() is by developers who do not know that the
> > function starts searching at the provided address upwards for the next
> > vma. This results in a bug that is often overlooked for a long time.
> >
> > Adding the new vma_lookup() function will allow for cleaner code by
> > removing the find_vma() calls which check limits, making
> > find_vma_intersection() calls of a single address to be shorter, and
> > potentially reduce the incorrect uses of find_vma().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
>
> This seems like a good API to have, and I agree it's less error prone than
> having every caller check the vma->vm_start address.
>
> Minor nitpick, I would prefer if the implementation used find_vma()
> and then checked the vma->vm_start address - I don't like using [i, i+1)
> intervals to implement stabbing queries.
Okay, I will make that change.
>
> But other than that, I think this (and the other patches adding
> corresponding call sites) is safe for merging.
>
Thanks,
Liam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists