[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bl9s8kfb.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 07:18:16 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-abi@...r.kernel.org,
"libc-alpha@...rceware.org" <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>,
Keno Fischer <keno@...iacomputing.com>
Subject: Re: Candidate Linux ABI for Intel AMX and hypothetical new related
features
* Len Brown:
> 5. If the feature is enabled in XCR0, the user happily uses it.
>
> For AMX, Linux implements "transparent first use"
> so that it doesn't have to allocate 8KB context switch
> buffers for tasks that don't actually use AMX.
> It does this by arming XFD for all tasks, and taking a #NM
> to allocate a context switch buffer only for those tasks
> that actually execute AMX instructions.
What happens if the kernel cannot allocate that additional context
switch buffer?
Thanks,
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists