[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210503072710.GL1981@kadam>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 10:27:11 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/43] staging: rtl8723bs: remove if-else blocks left
empty by ODM_RT_TRACE deletion
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 04:56:24PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> @@ -1533,13 +1529,10 @@ static void phy_IQCalibrate_8723B(
> result[t][6] = (PHY_QueryBBReg(pDM_Odm->Adapter, rRx_Power_Before_IQK_A_2, bMaskDWord)&0x3FF0000)>>16;
> result[t][7] = (PHY_QueryBBReg(pDM_Odm->Adapter, rRx_Power_After_IQK_A_2, bMaskDWord)&0x3FF0000)>>16;
> break;
> - } else {
> }
> }
>
> /* Allen end */
This comment doesn't mean anything. It feels like it was supposed to
go with the code that you deleted so it should have been deleted as part
of deleting the empty block. But it's fine to me if you delete it in
a later patch.
> - if (0x00 == PathBOK) {
> - }
> }
>
> /* Back to BB mode, load original value */
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists