linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] sched,fair: Skip newidle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YJESKDaf3U3XYcuG@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 4 May 2021 11:21:44 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched,fair: Skip newidle_balance if a wakeup is
 pending

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 07:09:46PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 19:02, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com> wrote:
> >
> > The try_to_wake_up function has an optimization where it can queue
> > a task for wakeup on its previous CPU, if the task is still in the
> > middle of going to sleep inside schedule().
> >
> > Once schedule() re-enables IRQs, the task will be woken up with an
> > IPI, and placed back on the runqueue.
> >
> > If we have such a wakeup pending, there is no need to search other
> > CPUs for runnable tasks. Just skip (or bail out early from) newidle
> > balancing, and run the just woken up task.
> >
> > For a memcache like workload test, this reduces total CPU use by
> > about 2%, proportionally split between user and system time,
> > and p99 and p95 application response time by 10% on average.
> > The schedstats run_delay number shows a similar improvement.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>

Thanks!