[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJE6eCyHtIONCJet@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 14:13:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
joro@...tes.org, Jon.Grimm@....com, amonakov@...ras.ru,
David Coe <david.coe@...e.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/events/amd/iommu: Fix invalid Perf result due to
IOMMU PMC power-gating
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 06:58:29PM +0700, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> Peter,
>
> On 5/4/2021 4:39 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 01:52:36AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> >
> > > 2. Since AMD IOMMU PMU does not support interrupt mode, the logic
> > > can be simplified to always start counting with value zero,
> > > and accumulate the counter value when stopping without the need
> > > to keep track and reprogram the counter with the previously read
> > > counter value.
> >
> > This relies on the hardware counter being the full 64bit wide, is it?
> >
>
> The HW counter value is 48-bit. Not sure why it needs to be 64-bit?
> I might be missing some points here? Could you please describe?
How do you deal with the 48bit overflow if you don't use the interrupt?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists