[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJFNyOGrF8RcTTlc@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 15:36:08 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@...tonmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 1/2] iwlwifi: Fix softirq/hardirq disabling in
iwl_pcie_gen2_enqueue_hcmd()
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 01:05:56PM +0000, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 4, 2021 10:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > All now queued up, thanks.
>
> For 5.4 and 4.19 and 4.14 kernels there were 2 patches,
> first patch is upstream commit 2800aadc18a64c96b051bcb7da8a7df7d505db3f,
That one is queued up, thanks.
> second patch is upstream commit e7020bb068d8be50a92f48e36b236a1a1ef9282e.
This is not in any newer stable trees, and it was not obvious what you
were doing here at all.
> First patch modifies iwlwifi/pcie/tx.c (older models use this)
> Second patch modifies iwlwifi/pcie/tx-gen2.c (for newer models)
>
> I see you queued only the "tx.c" patches, not the "tx-gen2.c" ones.
That is because it is not in 5.12.y yet either, right?
If it needs to be there, please let us know. Having a subject line that
said "5.10" for all of these was impossible to determine...
So, for e7020bb068d8 ("iwlwifi: Fix softirq/hardirq disabling in
iwl_pcie_gen2_enqueue_hcmd()") what tree(s) do you need it in exactly?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists