lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 May 2021 10:51:10 -0400
From:   Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     michal.simek@...inx.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pwm: Add Xilinx AXI Timer



On 5/3/21 8:21 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
 > On Mon, 03 May 2021 17:44:12 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
 >> This adds a binding for the Xilinx LogiCORE IP AXI Timer. This device is
 >> a "soft" block, so it has many parameters which would not be
 >> configurable in most hardware. This binding is usually automatically
 >> generated by Xilinx's tools, so the names and values of properties
 >> must be kept as they are.
 >>
 >> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
 >> ---
 >>
 >>   .../bindings/pwm/xlnx,axi-timer.yaml          | 91 +++++++++++++++++++
 >>   1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
 >>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/xlnx,axi-timer.yaml
 >>
 >
 > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
 > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
 >
 > yamllint warnings/errors:
 >
 > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
 > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/xlnx,axi-timer.example.dt.yaml: example-0: timer@...e0000:reg:0: [0, 2148401152, 0, 65536] is too long
 > 	From schema: /usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/dtschema/schemas/reg.yaml

What is the correct way to specify the 'reg' property? I see many
schemas doing what I did here which is 'reg: maxItems: 1'. Should I
instead use 'reg: true'?

--Sean

 >
 > See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1473421
 >
 > This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
 > series is generally the most recent rc1.
 >
 > If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
 > error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
 > date:
 >
 > pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
 >
 > Please check and re-submit.
 >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ