lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJFs1KspK2aapNSk@dU2104>
Date:   Tue, 4 May 2021 21:18:36 +0530
From:   Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: media: atomisp: pci: reposition braces as per
 coding style

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 10:48:12PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 08:12:41PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Deepak,
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 10:34:37PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:33:27PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > > Hi Deepak,
> > > > 
> > > > If you're touching all these lines, I might do a little more. Please see
> > > > the comments below.
> > > > 
> > > Hello Sakari,
> > > I can definitely include other changes, but then it will be many different
> > > types of changes into a single patch. Will that be okay?
> > > 
> > > I was planning to address one issue per patch as I think the volume of
> > > change is going to be high.  I mentioned that in the notes section of the patch
> > > message.
> > 
> > I think I'd split the patch into smaller chunks if the result becomes too
> > big but I don't think it's necessary yet.
> > 
> > Splitting different kinds of simple cleanups into several patches takes
> > longer time to review when they're touching the same piece of code. As the
> > chunks in these patches have virtually no dependencies to other chunks,
> > it's fine to do several kinds of cleanups at once.
> 
> Okay, sure. That sounds good to me. I will include other related
> improvements in the same area and send split patch set accordingly. I will
> include this patch in the patch set.

Hello Sakari and all,
I have sent in the changes as suggested in a patch set with 5 individual
patches. I will wait for your review and feedback before I work on other
files.

Thank you,
deepak.

> 
> Thank you for the guidance.
> deepak.
> 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Kind regards,
> > 
> > Sakari Ailus


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ