linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] kconfig: unify cc-option and as-option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNAROdVMPQq4Qn_M=OWzJrfqNOc4fyMicNKdnCqu7G9rFgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 May 2021 06:05:42 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:     Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kconfig: unify cc-option and as-option

On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 5:52 AM Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 05:46 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> >  - This commit touches scripts/Kconfig.include.
> >  - External module builds (M= builds) never invoke Kconfig
> >
> > Putting these two together, your claim is really odd.
>
> Hmm.
>
> > If external module builds invoke Kconfig,
> > your kernel is already broken.
>
> Well, it's not about the kernel, that's just the normal upstream (or
> perhaps distribution) kernel.
>
> Anyway, you're right, it's much simpler. The problem isn't invoking M=
> or something like that, that happens much later and sent me on the
> completely wrong track.
>
> The problem is simply doing
>
>         make kernelversion
>
> to determine the version of a tree that's not writable to the user, e.g.
>
>         make -C /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/ kernelversion
>
> Which basically also means that it's harmless, since the version is of
> course not affected by cc-option.

It was fixed.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=805b2e1d427aab4bb27fa7c51ebb9db7547551b1



If you want to make it work without that commit,

   make -C /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/ kernelversion M=/tmp

will work.

Pass a writable directory to M=.
M= build never touches the kernel source tree.



> johannes
>


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada