[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 07:21:53 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka1@...il.com>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] leds: Add driver for Qualcomm LPG
Hello,
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:13:27AM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 04 May 10:43 CDT 2021, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > So downstream they have (last time I looked at the code) an addition in
> > > the PWM API where the LED driver can inform the PWM driver part about
> > > the indices to use. Naturally I don't think that's a good idea.
> >
> > Dunno. Is it bad idea?
> >
> > pattern support for other PWMs (vibration?) seems useful, too. Yes, it
> > means more discussion and extending PWMs properly..
> >
>
> @Thierry, @Lee, @Uwe, are you interested in extending the PWM api with
> some sort of support for specifying an array of "duty_cycle" and some
> property for how fast the hardware should cycle through those duty
> cycles? (And I need a bit/bool to indicate if the pattern should run
> once of be repeated)
>
> The (current) use case relates to being able to alter the duty cycle
> over time to create "effects" such as pulsing an LED.
My personal opinion here is that this is too special to be worth the
generalisation.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists