[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 15:04:18 -0500
From: Shanker R Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Amey Narkhede <ameynarkhede03@...il.com>
CC: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>, Vikram Sethi <vsethi@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: Enable NO_BUS_RESET quirk for Nvidia GPUs
Thanks Alex for the detailed explanation.
On 5/5/21 2:13 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> I'm also assuming all SoCs integrating this GPU will provide a
> _RST method, but we're also disabling SBR in this series to avoid the
> only other generic reset option we'd have for this device.
All the platforms/SoCs which contain these GPUs will provide ACPI/firmware with
_RST method.
> In the more general case, I'd expect that system firmware isn't going
> to implement an _RST method for a pluggable slot, so we'll lookup the
> ACPI handle, fail to find a _RST method and drop to the next option.
> For a PCI/e slot, at best the _RST method might be included in the _PRR
> scope rather than the device scope to indicate it affects the entire
> slot. That could be something like the #PERST below or a warm reset. I
> don't think we're enabling that here, are we?
No, our_RST method will be included only in a device context (not _PRP).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists