[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 15:36:47 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] KVM: VMX: Disable loading of TSX_CTRL MSR the more
conventional way
On Wed, May 05, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/05/21 19:17, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Tag TSX_CTRL as not needing to be loaded when RTM isn't supported in the
> > host. Crushing the write mask to '0' has the same effect, but requires
> > more mental gymnastics to understand.
>
> This doesn't explain _why_ this is now possible. What about:
>
> Now that user return MSRs is always present in the list, we don't have
User return MSRs aren't always present in the list; this series doesn't change
that behavior at all.
> the problem that the TSX_CTRL MSR needs a slot vmx->guest_uret_msrs even
> if RTM is not supported in the host (and therefore there is nothing to
> enable). Thus we can simply tag TSX_CTRL as not needing to be loaded
> instead of crushing the write mask to '0'.
Unless I'm missing something, it would have been possible to give TSX_CTRL a
slot but not load it even before this refactoring, we just missed that approach
when handling the TSX_CTRL without HLE/RTM case. Several other MSRs rely on
this behavior, notably the SYSCALL MSRs, which are present in the list so that
the guest can read/write the MSRs, but are loaded into hardware iff the guest
has enabled SYSCALL.
All that said, I certainly have no objection to writing a longer changelog.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists