linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: hid-sensor-custom: Process failure of sensor_hub_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 May 2021 04:44:21 +0000
From:   "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>
To:     "jikos@...nel.org" <jikos@...nel.org>,
        "benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com" <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
CC:     "jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com" <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "abaci@...ux.alibaba.com" <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: hid-sensor-custom: Process failure of
 sensor_hub_set_feature()

Hi Benjamin,

On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 15:28 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:38 PM Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 15 Apr 2021, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> > 
> > > When user modifies a custom feature value and
> > > sensor_hub_set_feature()
> > > fails, return error.
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <
> > > srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > Replaces patch: HID: hid-sensor-custom: remove useless variable
> > > by Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > > 
> > >  drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c | 2 ++
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c b/drivers/hid/hid-
> > > sensor-custom.c
> > > index 2628bc53ed80..58b54b127cdf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
> > > @@ -406,6 +406,8 @@ static ssize_t store_value(struct device
> > > *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> > >                                                              
> > > report_id;
> > >               ret = sensor_hub_set_feature(sensor_inst->hsdev,
> > > report_id,
> > >                                            index, sizeof(value),
> > > &value);
> > > +             if (ret)
> > > +                     return ret;
> > 
> > What tree is this patch against? In my tree, we're not even
> > assigning
> > sensor_hub_set_feature() return value to anything.
> > 
> 
> I guess there was a "collision". At roughly the same time I merged
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-input/list/?series=456269
> people were starting to send various patches for the same thing.
> 
> Srinivas, either the change in for-next (and probably Linus' master
> now) is fine, or could you rebase on top of hid.git?
> 

Rebased and attached based on top of the latest mainline.

Thanks,
Srinivas


> Cheers,
> Benjamin
> 


View attachment "0001-HID-hid-sensor-custom-Process-failure-of-sensor_hub_.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1640 bytes)