[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3697ddda1bba9179aa669e444b37f134@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 10:18:37 +0530
From: skakit@...eaurora.org
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
kgunda@...eaurora.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom-pmic-gpio: Convert qcom
pmic gpio bindings to YAML
Hi Rob,
On 2021-04-09 02:23, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 06:05:45PM +0530, satya priya wrote:
>> Convert Qualcomm PMIC GPIO bindings from .txt to .yaml format.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: satya priya <skakit@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> Changes in V3:
>> - As per Rob's comments fixed bot erros.
>> - Moved this patch to end of the series so that other patches are not
>> blocked on this.
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.txt | 280
>> --------------------
>> .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml | 281
>> +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 281 insertions(+), 280 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.txt
>> create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml
>
>
>> diff --git
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..e7e7027
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Qualcomm PMIC GPIO block
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
>> +
>> +description: |
>> + This binding describes the GPIO block(s) found in the 8xxx series
>> of
>> + PMIC's from Qualcomm.
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + items:
>> + - enum:
>> + - qcom,pm8005-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm8018-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm8038-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm8058-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm8916-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm8917-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm8921-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm8941-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm8950-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm8994-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm8998-gpio
>> + - qcom,pma8084-gpio
>> + - qcom,pmi8950-gpio
>> + - qcom,pmi8994-gpio
>> + - qcom,pmi8998-gpio
>> + - qcom,pms405-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm660-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm660l-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm8150-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm8150b-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm6150-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm6150l-gpio
>> + - qcom,pmx55-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm7325-gpio
>> + - qcom,pm8350c-gpio
>> + - qcom,pmk8350-gpio
>> + - qcom,pmr735a-gpio
>> +
>> + - enum:
>> + - qcom,spmi-gpio
>> + - qcom,ssbi-gpio
>
> Any combination of the 1st and 2nd entry is valid?
>
No, for pmics which use spmi and ssbi buses, "qcom,spmi-gpio" and
"qcom,ssbi-gpio" compatibles should be used respectively.
>> +
>> + reg:
>> + description: Register base of the GPIO block and length.
>
> Just:
>
> maxItems: 1
>
ok.
>> +
>> + interrupts:
>> + description: |
>> + Must contain an array of encoded interrupt specifiers for
>> + each available GPIO
>
> Need to define how many interrupts. I assume there's some max.
>
ok will add maxItems.
>> +
>> + '#interrupt-cells':
>> + const: 2
>> +
>> + interrupt-controller: true
>> +
>> + gpio-controller: true
>> +
>> + gpio-ranges:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + '#gpio-cells':
>> + const: 2
>> + description: |
>> + The first cell will be used to define gpio number and the
>> + second denotes the flags for this gpio
>> +
>> + gpio-keys:
>> + type: object
>> + properties:
>> + volume-keys:
>> + type: object
>
> Needs a $ref to pinmux-node.yaml and pincfg-node.yaml.
>
can I add like below?
volume-keys:
type: object
+ anyOf:
+ - $ref: "pinmux-node.yaml"
+ - $ref: "pincfg-node.yaml"
>> + properties:
>> + pins:
>> + description: |
>> + List of gpio pins affected by the properties
>> specified in
>> + this subnode. Valid pins are
>> + - gpio1-gpio4 for pm8005
>> + - gpio1-gpio6 for pm8018
>> + - gpio1-gpio12 for pm8038
>> + - gpio1-gpio40 for pm8058
>> + - gpio1-gpio4 for pm8916
>> + - gpio1-gpio38 for pm8917
>> + - gpio1-gpio44 for pm8921
>> + - gpio1-gpio36 for pm8941
>> + - gpio1-gpio8 for pm8950 (hole on gpio3)
>> + - gpio1-gpio22 for pm8994
>> + - gpio1-gpio26 for pm8998
>> + - gpio1-gpio22 for pma8084
>> + - gpio1-gpio2 for pmi8950
>> + - gpio1-gpio10 for pmi8994
>> + - gpio1-gpio12 for pms405 (holes on gpio1, gpio9
>> + and gpio10)
>> + - gpio1-gpio10 for pm8150 (holes on gpio2,
>> gpio5,
>> + gpio7 and gpio8)
>> + - gpio1-gpio12 for pm8150b (holes on gpio3,
>> gpio4
>> + and gpio7)
>> + - gpio1-gpio12 for pm8150l (hole on gpio7)
>> + - gpio1-gpio10 for pm6150
>> + - gpio1-gpio12 for pm6150l
>> + - gpio1-gpio10 for pm7325
>> + - gpio1-gpio9 for pm8350c
>> + - gpio1-gpio4 for pmk8350
>> + - gpio1-gpio4 for pmr735a
>> +
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string-array
>
> Already has a type in pinmux-node.yaml.
>
Okay, will add above and remove here.
>> + items:
>> + pattern: "^gpio([0-9]+)$"
>> +
>> + function:
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
>
> ditto
>
Okay, will add above and remove here.
>> + description: |
>> + Specify the alternative function to be configured for
>> the
>> + specified pins.
>> + items:
>> + - enum:
>> + - normal
>> + - paired
>> + - func1
>> + - func2
>> + - dtest1
>> + - dtest2
>> + - dtest3
>> + - dtest4
>> + - func3 # supported by LV/MV GPIO subtypes
>> + - func4 # supported by LV/MV GPIO subtypes
>> +
>> + bias-disable:
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
>
> And all these have a type and description. Just:
>
> bias-disable: true
>
> If no further constraints.
>
Okay.
>> + description:
>> + The specified pins should be configured as no pull.
>> +
>> + bias-pull-down:
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
[...]
>> + additionalProperties: true
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: true
>
> Should be 'false'.
>
Okay.
Thanks,
Satya Priya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists