linux-kernel - [PATCH] RISC-V: Don't check text_mutex during stop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210506071041.417854-1-palmer@dabbelt.com>
Date:   Thu,  6 May 2021 00:10:41 -0700
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To:         linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
        mhiramat@...nel.org, zong.li@...ive.com, guoren@...ux.alibaba.com,
        Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
        Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Don't check text_mutex during stop_machine

From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>

We're currently using stop_machine() to update ftrace, which means that
the thread that takes text_mutex during ftrace_prepare() may not be the
same as the thread that eventually patches the code.  This isn't
actually a race because the lock is still held (preventing any other
concurrent accesses) and there is only one thread running during
stop_machine(), but it does trigger a lockdep failure.

This patch just elides the lockdep check during stop_machine.

Fixes: c15ac4fd60d5 ("riscv/ftrace: Add dynamic function tracer support")
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Reported-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
---
In theory we should be able to avoid using stop_machine() with some
clever code sequences, but that's too big of a change to be considered a
fix.  I also can't find the text I thought was in the ISA manual about
the allowed behaviors for concurrent modification of the instruction
stream, so I might have just mis-remembered that.
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h |  4 ++++
 arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c      | 15 +++++++++++++++
 arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c       | 10 +++++++++-
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
index 04dad3380041..ee8f07b4dbee 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
@@ -85,4 +85,8 @@ int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec);
 
 #endif
 
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+extern int riscv_ftrace_in_stop_machine;
+#endif
+
 #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_FTRACE_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
index 7f1e5203de88..da2405652f1d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/patch.h>
 
+int riscv_ftrace_in_stop_machine;
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
 int ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare(void) __acquires(&text_mutex)
 {
@@ -232,3 +234,16 @@ int ftrace_disable_ftrace_graph_caller(void)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE */
 #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
+
+void arch_ftrace_update_code(int command)
+{
+	/*
+	 * The code sequences we use for ftrace can't be patched while the
+	 * kernel is running, so we need to use stop_machine() to modify them
+	 * for now.  This doesn't play nice with text_mutex, we use this flag
+	 * to elide the check.
+	 */
+	riscv_ftrace_in_stop_machine = true;
+	ftrace_run_stop_machine(command);
+	riscv_ftrace_in_stop_machine = false;
+}
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
index 0b552873a577..7983dba477f0 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include <asm/kprobes.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/fixmap.h>
+#include <asm/ftrace.h>
 #include <asm/patch.h>
 
 struct patch_insn {
@@ -59,8 +60,15 @@ static int patch_insn_write(void *addr, const void *insn, size_t len)
 	 * Before reaching here, it was expected to lock the text_mutex
 	 * already, so we don't need to give another lock here and could
 	 * ensure that it was safe between each cores.
+	 *
+	 * We're currently using stop_machine() for ftrace, and while that
+	 * ensures text_mutex is held before installing the mappings it does
+	 * not ensure text_mutex is held by the calling thread.  That's safe
+	 * but triggers a lockdep failure, so just elide it for that specific
+	 * case.
 	 */
-	lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex);
+	if (!riscv_ftrace_in_stop_machine)
+		lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex);
 
 	if (across_pages)
 		patch_map(addr + len, FIX_TEXT_POKE1);
-- 
2.31.1.527.g47e6f16901-goog