[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1620288026-5373-1-git-send-email-luojiaxing@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 16:00:26 +0800
From: Luo Jiaxing <luojiaxing@...wei.com>
To: <pmladek@...e.com>, <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
<luojiaxing@...wei.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] printk: stop spining waiter when console resume to flush prb
Some threads still call printk() for printing when resume_console() is
being executed. In practice, the printk() is executed for a period of time
and then returned. The duration is determined by the number of prints
cached in the prb during the suspend/resume process. At the same time,
resume_console() returns quickly.
Base on owner/waiter machanism, the frist one who fail to lock console will
become waiter, and start spining. When current owner finish print one
informance, if a waiter is waitting, owner will give up and let waiter
become a new owner. New owner need to flush the whole prb unitl prb empty
or another new waiter come and take the job from him.
So the first waiter after resume_console() will take seconds to help to
flush prb, but driver which call printk() may be bothered by this. New
a flag to mark resume flushing prb. When the console resume, before the
prb is empty, stop to set a new waiter temporarily.
Signed-off-by: Luo Jiaxing <luojiaxing@...wei.com>
---
kernel/printk/printk.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 575a34b..2c680a5 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -287,6 +287,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(console_set_on_cmdline);
/* Flag: console code may call schedule() */
static int console_may_schedule;
+/* Flags: console flushing prb when resume */
+static atomic_t console_resume_flush_prb = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+
enum con_msg_format_flags {
MSG_FORMAT_DEFAULT = 0,
MSG_FORMAT_SYSLOG = (1 << 0),
@@ -1781,7 +1784,8 @@ static int console_trylock_spinning(void)
raw_spin_lock(&console_owner_lock);
owner = READ_ONCE(console_owner);
waiter = READ_ONCE(console_waiter);
- if (!waiter && owner && owner != current) {
+ if (!waiter && owner && owner != current &&
+ !atomic_read(&console_resume_flush_prb)) {
WRITE_ONCE(console_waiter, true);
spin = true;
}
@@ -2355,6 +2359,7 @@ void resume_console(void)
if (!console_suspend_enabled)
return;
down_console_sem();
+ atomic_set(&console_resume_flush_prb, 1);
console_suspended = 0;
console_unlock();
}
@@ -2592,6 +2597,8 @@ void console_unlock(void)
raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
up_console_sem();
+ if (atomic_read(&console_resume_flush_prb))
+ atomic_set(&console_resume_flush_prb, 0);
/*
* Someone could have filled up the buffer again, so re-check if there's
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists