linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio:accel:stk8312: Remove ACPI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 May 2021 12:29:44 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio:accel:stk8312: Remove ACPI support

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:57 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> With CONFIG_ACPI=n, W=1 and -Werror, 0-day reports:
>
> drivers/iio/accel/stk8312.c:644:36: error:
>         'stk8312_acpi_id' defined but not used
>
> Apparently STK8312 is not a valid ACPI ID. Remove it and with it
> ACPI support from the stk8312 driver.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>

For the record, point finger on me in case somebody complains about
any of such patches.

> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> There is another patch pending which makes whitespace changes in struct
> acpi_device_id stk8312_acpi_id. This will result in a conflict if this
> patch is applied. In that patch, it is claimed that the driver would
> possibly only be used based on its ACPI ID (even though that ACPI device
> ID is not official).
> Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-iio/patch/20210401144226.225928-1-jic23@kernel.org/
> I can not determine if that claim has any truth in it. Still, it appears
> that the device ID is not an official device ID.
>
>  drivers/iio/accel/stk8312.c | 9 ---------
>  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/stk8312.c b/drivers/iio/accel/stk8312.c
> index 157d8faefb9e..2fc30cfe1457 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/stk8312.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/stk8312.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
>   * IIO driver for STK8312; 7-bit I2C address: 0x3D.
>   */
>
> -#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/i2c.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> @@ -640,18 +639,10 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id stk8312_i2c_id[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, stk8312_i2c_id);
>
> -static const struct acpi_device_id stk8312_acpi_id[] = {
> -       {"STK8312", 0},
> -       {}
> -};
> -
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, stk8312_acpi_id);
> -
>  static struct i2c_driver stk8312_driver = {
>         .driver = {
>                 .name = STK8312_DRIVER_NAME,
>                 .pm = STK8312_PM_OPS,
> -               .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(stk8312_acpi_id),
>         },
>         .probe =            stk8312_probe,
>         .remove =           stk8312_remove,
> --
> 2.25.1
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko