[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJPFA/s44ChuGV9+@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 12:29:23 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Ning, Hongyu" <hongyu.ning@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: joel@...lfernandes.org, chris.hyser@...cle.com, joshdon@...gle.com,
mingo@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
valentin.schneider@....com, mgorman@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] sched: Core Scheduling
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 02:47:00PM +0800, Ning, Hongyu wrote:
> Adding sysbench/uperf/wis performance results for reference:
>
> - kernel under test:
> -- above patchset of core-scheduling + local fix for softlockup issue: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5c289c5a-a120-a1d0-ca89-2724a1445fe8@linux.intel.com/
> -- coresched_v10 kernel source: https://github.com/digitalocean/linux-coresched/commits/coresched/v10-v5.10.y
Shall I summarize all this as:
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@...ux.intel.com>
?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists