[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9f72764-2766-d663-4343-a7d5d0a9145f@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 20:53:53 +0800
From: "Ning, Hongyu" <hongyu.ning@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: joel@...lfernandes.org, chris.hyser@...cle.com, joshdon@...gle.com,
mingo@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
valentin.schneider@....com, mgorman@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] sched: Core Scheduling
On 2021/5/6 18:29, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 02:47:00PM +0800, Ning, Hongyu wrote:
>> Adding sysbench/uperf/wis performance results for reference:
>>
>> - kernel under test:
>> -- above patchset of core-scheduling + local fix for softlockup issue: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5c289c5a-a120-a1d0-ca89-2724a1445fe8@linux.intel.com/
>> -- coresched_v10 kernel source: https://github.com/digitalocean/linux-coresched/commits/coresched/v10-v5.10.y
>
> Shall I summarize all this as:
>
> Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@...ux.intel.com>
>
> ?
>
Yes, that would be great.
Regards,
Hongyu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists