[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGuPpihBj9GQbuPKXuZvY=+Bid-pSB9XPP2ZXNQvHEm-Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 08:02:40 -0700
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To: sbillaka@...eaurora.org
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU"
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU"
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Kalyan Thota <kalyan_t@...eaurora.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@...eaurora.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@...eaurora.org>,
Krishna Manikandan <mkrishn@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Add support for next gen eDP driver on SnapDragon
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 11:47 PM <sbillaka@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> On 2021-05-05 15:31, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 11:17, Sankeerth Billakanti
> > <sbillaka@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> These patches add support for the next generation eDP driver on
> >> SnapDragon
> >> with dpu support. The existing eDP driver cannot support the new eDP
> >> hardware. So, to maintain backward compatibility, the older eDP driver
> >> is
> >> moved to v200 folder and the new generation eDP driver is added in
> >> the v510 folder.
> >
> > What exactly does this version correspond to?
> > I assume that v510 corresponds to sdmshrike/sc8180x. Is it right?
> [Sankeerth] This is for sc7280.
>
> > Is it really so specific, or just v2/v5 would be enough? Not to
> > mention that this is the MDP/ version, while other blocks tend to use
> > block-specific versions/ids.
> [Sankeerth] I can rename it as edp-v1 and edp-v2. Edp v1 is very old
> chip and there is considerable HW delta between v1 and v2. So, we want
> to separate the driver. We followed similar model for DPU driver where,
> MDP4, MDP5 and DPU have separate folders. EDP v1 belongs to MDP4
> generation.
Bjorn brought up the idea of just dropping the existing drm/msm/edp..
since the efforts to upstream the platform it worked on (8084?)
fizzled out, I don't think there is any device which uses it.
But it does sound like edp is a subset of the the newer dp driver, so
seems sort of like the better approach would be to add edp support to
dp. I believe Bjorn has something based on this approach which is
working for sc8280 (although not sure if it is in shape to post
patches yet)
BR,
-R
> >
> > Also, how much does it differ from the current DP core supported via
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp ?
> [Sankeerth] eDP is a native controller like DP but does not have audio,
> content protection and interoperability requirement. Upstream already
> supports eDP as a new interface driver found here:
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp.
> I wanted to add the new controller driver as part of that folder.
>
> >
> > First two patches did not make it to the linux-msm, so I can not
> > comment on each of the lines.
> [Sankeerth] I am also not sure why they did not make it to patchwork. I
> will repost them.
>
> > However just my few cents (other reviewers might disagree though):
> >
> > - I see little benefit in renaming the folders just for the sake of
> > renaming. You can put your code in drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp-v510, if
> > you really insist on that. Note that for all other (even incompatible)
> > hardware types we still use single level of folders.
> >
> > - Also I see that significant parts of code (e.g. AUX, bridge,
> > connector, maybe more) are just c&p of old edp code pieces. Please
> > share the code instead of duplicating it.
> [Sankeerth] It is a baseline driver. As we add more features, it will
> considerably deviate a lot. The effort seems to be very high to maintain
> the common portion of code as I expect a lot of deviation.
> >
> > - Please consider updating register definitions in xml form and then
> > providing both changed xml files (to mesa project (?)) and generated
> > headers into the kernel.
> [Sankeerth] I followed what was done in the DP driver at
> /drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp. I need to explore the xml approach to generate
> the register definitions.
> >
> > - Please consider using clk_bulk_* functions instead of using
> > dss_module_power. I'm going to send a patchset reworking current users
> > to use the generic clk_bulk_* function family.
> [Sankeerth] I will explore and rebase after your patch is available.
> >
> > - In generic, this eDP clock handling seems to match closely DP clocks
> > handling (with all the name comparison, etc). Consider moving this to
> > a generic piece of code
> >
> > - PHY seems to be a version of QMP PHY. Please use it, like it was
> > done for the DP itself. There is support for combined USB+DP PHYs
> > (both v3 and v4), so it should be possible to extend that for eDP.
> [Sankeerth] The DP phy is a combophy which supports both usb and dp phy
> concurrently, unlike eDP phy which is specific to only the eDP
> controller in sc7280. So, I implemented the edp phy sequences in the
> same folder.
> >
> >
> >> These are baseline changes with which we can enable display. The new
> >> eDP
> >> controller can also support additional features such as backlight
> >> control,
> >> PSR etc. which will be enabled in subsequent patch series.
> >>
> >> Summary of changes:
> >> DPU driver interface to the new eDP v510 display driver.
> >> New generation eDP controller and phy driver implementation.
> >> A common interface to choose enable the required eDP driver.
> >>
> >> Sankeerth Billakanti (3):
> >> drm/msm/edp: support multiple generations of edp hardware
> >> drm/msm/edp: add support for next gen edp
> >> drm/msm/disp/dpu1: add support for edp encoder
> >>
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile | 19 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 7 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 33 +
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp.c | 198 ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp.h | 78 -
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp.xml.h | 380 -----
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp_aux.c | 264 ----
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp_bridge.c | 111 --
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp_common.c | 38 +
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp_common.h | 47 +
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp_connector.c | 132 --
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp_ctrl.c | 1375
> >> ------------------
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp_phy.c | 98 --
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp.xml.h | 380 +++++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp_v200.c | 210 +++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp_v200.h | 70 +
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp_v200_aux.c | 264 ++++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp_v200_bridge.c | 111 ++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp_v200_connector.c | 132 ++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp_v200_ctrl.c | 1375
> >> ++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp_v200_phy.c | 98 ++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510.c | 220 +++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510.h | 151 ++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510_aux.c | 268 ++++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510_bridge.c | 111 ++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510_connector.c | 117 ++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510_ctrl.c | 1583
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510_phy.c | 641 +++++++++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510_reg.h | 339 +++++
> >> 29 files changed, 6207 insertions(+), 2643 deletions(-)
> >> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp.c
> >> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp.h
> >> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp.xml.h
> >> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp_aux.c
> >> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp_bridge.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp_common.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp_common.h
> >> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp_connector.c
> >> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp_ctrl.c
> >> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/edp_phy.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp.xml.h
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp_v200.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp_v200.h
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp_v200_aux.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp_v200_bridge.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp_v200_connector.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp_v200_ctrl.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v200/edp_v200_phy.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510.h
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510_aux.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510_bridge.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510_connector.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510_ctrl.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510_phy.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/edp/v510/edp_v510_reg.h
> >>
> >> --
> >> The Qualcomm Innovatin Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
> >> Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists