[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43df6483efd78b46f53e865bd75d75a4@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 11:17:56 -0500
From: bcain@...eaurora.org
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-hexagon <linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sidneym@...eaurora.org,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] hexagon changes for v5.13
On 2021-05-06 11:16, bcain@...eaurora.org wrote:
> On 2021-05-06 11:03, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:10 PM <bcain@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Please pull the following changes for Hexagon: they contain build
>>> fixes.
>>
>> The pull looks fine, but I'm wondering what key you've signed this
>> with?
>>
>> I find your key 175C464E541B6D47 in the kernel.org pgpkeys archive,
>> but your tag was signed with RSA key 1A54AFB8E5646C32, which I don't
>> find.
>>
>> And the standard keyservers are - as usual - not very helpful.
>
> I apologize -- in my initial account setup I'd done the key creation
> without a signing feature/capability. So in order to sign the tag I
> realized I needed a new subkey for signing. I tried broadcasting the
> new key but perhaps I did not send it correctly. I'll try it again
> today.
>
> http://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?search=bcain&fingerprint=on&op=index
>
> ^^^ this shows one that has 3d66aae474594824c88ce0f81a54afb8e5646c32
> but I'm not quite sure if this is a good keyserver or not.
Oh, but the new signing subkey has not been signed by anyone yet. I
will see about that.
-Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists