[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJTxH/VsUEIR7rL5@google.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 16:49:51 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: luojiaxing <luojiaxing@...wei.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, john.ogness@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com,
bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: stop spining waiter when console resume to flush
prb
On (21/05/07 15:33), luojiaxing wrote:
> > console_unlock()
> > {
> > ...
> >
> > if (printed_messages > limit && !console_lock_spinning_disable_and_check()) {
> > printk_safe_exit_irqrestore(flags);
> >
> > console_locked = 0;
> > up_console_sem();
> >
> > defer_console_output();
> > return;
> > }
>
>
> Hi, Sergey, I test this, it works.
>
>
> But, I have a doubt. If the log buffer exceeds limit, we can schedule IRQ
> work to become the console lock owner and let current context return.
>
> So why not just let the IRQ work process the console output without limit?
log buffer can be several tenth of megabytes in size which IRQ work
will have to print to a potentially slow serial console, which will
trigger watchdogs on the CPU that IRQ is running on.
> I wonder if the driver can only cache the print and queue the output tasks
> to a workqueue to return
Work queue task is preemptible, which did cause problems in the past:
huge printing delays under memory pressure. So, ideally, what we want
from a console lock owner is be non-preemptible and to either print
pending messages or handover the lock to another task.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists