[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210507191400.6258dee6@alex-virtual-machine>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 19:14:00 +0800
From: Aili Yao <yaoaili@...gsoft.com>
To: "HORIGUCHI NAOYA堀口 直也)"
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>
CC: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Jue Wang <juew@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<yaoaili126@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm,hwpoison: fix sending SIGBUS for Action
Required MCE
On Fri, 7 May 2021 05:24:22 +0000
HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) <naoya.horiguchi@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 03:37:07AM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > >> I updated the series based on previous feedbacks/discussions.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> >
> > Maybe this series should get a "Cc: stable" tag too?
>
> The second patch (I squashed 2/3 and 3/3 into one in v4) is a little
> too large (more than 100 lines of change), which doesn't meet stable rule.
> But the first patch looks suitable to me for stable.
Before cc:stable, would you please do one stress test first?
It failed in my server, but I didn't dig into it, maybe the fail is meaningless.
Just a small suggestion.
Thanks!
Aili Yao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists