[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d16537da-8256-f7ed-677d-011654c62bd4@rock-chips.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 09:48:32 +0800
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] mmc: core: Re-structure some code in
__mmc_poll_for_busy()
On 2021/5/5 0:12, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> To make the code a bit more understandable, let's move the check about
> whether polling is allowed or not, out to the caller instead. In this way,
> we can also drop the send_status in-parameter, so let's do that.
Everytime I check the parameters for busy polling, I have to look very
closely to make sure what the true or false stands for. So reducing the
parameters here make sense.
Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> index 66ae699a410f..ccaee1cb7ff5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> @@ -465,8 +465,7 @@ static int mmc_busy_status(struct mmc_card *card, bool retry_crc_err,
> }
>
> static int __mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int timeout_ms,
> - bool send_status, bool retry_crc_err,
> - enum mmc_busy_cmd busy_cmd)
> + bool retry_crc_err, enum mmc_busy_cmd busy_cmd)
> {
> struct mmc_host *host = card->host;
> int err;
> @@ -475,16 +474,6 @@ static int __mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int timeout_ms,
> bool expired = false;
> bool busy = false;
>
> - /*
> - * In cases when not allowed to poll by using CMD13 or because we aren't
> - * capable of polling by using ->card_busy(), then rely on waiting the
> - * stated timeout to be sufficient.
> - */
> - if (!send_status && !host->ops->card_busy) {
> - mmc_delay(timeout_ms);
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms) + 1;
> do {
> /*
> @@ -518,7 +507,7 @@ static int __mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int timeout_ms,
> int mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int timeout_ms,
> enum mmc_busy_cmd busy_cmd)
> {
> - return __mmc_poll_for_busy(card, timeout_ms, true, false, busy_cmd);
> + return __mmc_poll_for_busy(card, timeout_ms, false, busy_cmd);
> }
>
> bool mmc_prepare_busy_cmd(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd,
> @@ -591,8 +580,18 @@ int __mmc_switch(struct mmc_card *card, u8 set, u8 index, u8 value,
> mmc_host_is_spi(host))
> goto out_tim;
>
> + /*
> + * If the host doesn't support HW polling via the ->card_busy() ops and
> + * when it's not allowed to poll by using CMD13, then we need to rely on
> + * waiting the stated timeout to be sufficient.
> + */
> + if (!send_status && !host->ops->card_busy) {
> + mmc_delay(timeout_ms);
> + goto out_tim;
> + }
> +
> /* Let's try to poll to find out when the command is completed. */
> - err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(card, timeout_ms, send_status, retry_crc_err,
> + err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(card, timeout_ms, retry_crc_err,
> MMC_BUSY_CMD6);
> if (err)
> goto out;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists