linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] MAINTAINERS: Add Advantech AHC1EC0 embedded controller entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210507120347.27286-1-campion.kang@advantech.com.tw>
Date:   Fri, 7 May 2021 20:03:47 +0800
From:   Campion Kang <campion.kang@...antech.com.tw>
To:     <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     <campion.kang@...antech.com.tw>, <chia-lin.kao@...onical.com>,
        <corbet@....net>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <hdegoede@...hat.com>, <jdelvare@...e.com>, <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux@...ck-us.net>, <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] MAINTAINERS: Add Advantech AHC1EC0 embedded controller entry

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 8:50 AM
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] MAINTAINERS: Add Advantech AHC1EC0
>embedded controller entry
>
>On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 10:47:22AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm replying here since this series has no cover-letter, for
>> the next version for a series touching so many different
>> sub-systems it would be good to start with a cover-letter
>> providing some background info on the series.
>>
>> I see this is binding to an ACPI device, yet it is also using
>> devicetree bindings and properties.
>>
>> So I take it this means that your ACPI tables are using the
>> optional capability of embedded device-tree blobs inside the
>> ACPI tables ?
>
>Ugg, really. I would have stopped caring if I had realized.

I am very grateful for any comments you have made in the past, and please feel free to give friendly guidance.