[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210507150553.208763-3-peterx@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 11:05:52 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
peterx@...hat.com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: gup: allow FOLL_PIN to scale in SMP
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
has_pinned cannot be written by each pin-fast or it won't scale in
SMP. This isn't "false sharing" strictly speaking (it's more like
"true non-sharing"), but it creates the same SMP scalability
bottleneck of "false sharing".
To verify the improvement, below test is done on 40 cpus host with Intel(R)
Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz (must be with CONFIG_GUP_TEST=y):
$ sudo chrt -f 1 ./gup_test -a -m 512 -j 40
Where we can get (average value for 40 threads):
Old kernel: 477729.97 (+- 3.79%)
New kernel: 89144.65 (+-11.76%)
On a similar condition with 256 cpus, this commits increases the SMP
scalability of pin_user_pages_fast() executed by different threads of the same
process by more than 4000%.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
[peterx: rewrite commit message, add parentheses against "(A & B)"]
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
---
mm/gup.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index 63a079e361a3d..9933bc5c2eff2 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ static __always_inline long __get_user_pages_locked(struct mm_struct *mm,
BUG_ON(*locked != 1);
}
- if (flags & FOLL_PIN)
+ if ((flags & FOLL_PIN) && !atomic_read(&mm->has_pinned))
atomic_set(&mm->has_pinned, 1);
/*
@@ -2617,7 +2617,7 @@ static int internal_get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start,
FOLL_FAST_ONLY)))
return -EINVAL;
- if (gup_flags & FOLL_PIN)
+ if ((gup_flags & FOLL_PIN) && !atomic_read(¤t->mm->has_pinned))
atomic_set(¤t->mm->has_pinned, 1);
if (!(gup_flags & FOLL_FAST_ONLY))
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists