[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vcu-k=uzY_JYhtMp=Oe7fph3jH=t41pStUGc+bpSZeA3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 18:36:56 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@...inera.com>
Cc: "chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz"
<chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"wsa@...nel.org" <wsa@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] i2c: mpc: implement erratum A-004447 workaround
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 5:52 PM Joakim Tjernlund
<Joakim.Tjernlund@...inera.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-05-07 at 14:46 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 3:40 AM Chris Packham
> > <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
...
> > So, now you may shrink it even further, i.e.
> >
> > void __iomem *sr = i2c->base + MPC_I2C_SR;
> > u8 val;
> >
> > return readb_poll_timeout(sr, val, val & mask, 0, 100);
> >
>
> val looks uninitialised before use?
Nope.
Thinking about naming, perhaps
void __iomem *addr = i2c->base + MPC_I2C_SR;
u8 sr; // or leave as val?
return readb_poll_timeout(addr, sr, sr & mask, 0, 100);
would be more clear.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists