[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjhWKp=fQREgQy0uGjo-uvcTg-11gJLoDp4Af8WOKa8ig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 12:29:44 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: splice() from /dev/zero to a pipe does not work (5.9+)
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:17 PM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Umm... That would do wonders to anything that used to do
> copy_to_user()/clear_user()/copy_to_user() and got converted
> to copy_to_iter()/iov_iter_zero()/copy_to_iter()...
I didn't mean for iov_iter_zero doing this - only splice_read_zero().
> Are you sure we can shove zero page into pipe, anyway?
> IIRC, get_page()/put_page() on that is not allowed,
That's what the
buf->ops = &zero_pipe_buf_ops;
is for. The zero_pipe_buf_ops would have empty get and release
functions, and a 'steal' function that always returns false.
That's how the pipe pages are supposed to work: there are people who
put non-page data (ie things like skbuff allocations etc) into a
splice pipe buffer. It's why we have those "ops" pointers.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists