[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3540274.MHq7AAxBmi@phil>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 23:06:33 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
bgolaszewski@...libre.com, jay.xu@...k-chips.com,
shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, david.wu@...k-chips.com,
zhangqing@...k-chips.com, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
cl@...k-chips.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: gpio: convert rk3328-grf-gpio.txt to YAML
Am Freitag, 7. Mai 2021, 23:02:39 CEST schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 10:59:09PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Hi Bartosz,
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2021, 15:40:25 CEST schrieb Johan Jonker:
> > > Current dts files with RK3328 GRF 'gpio' nodes are manually verified.
> > > In order to automate this process rk3328-grf-gpio.txt has to be
> > > converted to YAML.
> > >
> > > Rename 'grf-gpio' nodename to 'gpio'.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
> >
> > just to not step on any toes, do you plan to apply this patch1 later on?
> > Patches 2-4 are in my domain so I'll get them after -rc1, but in theory
> > the gpio binding should go through the gpio tree.
>
> Different trees will break the schema checks because the grf schema
> refers to the gpio schema.
Ah, thanks for the heads up.
I guess we need to agree on one then.
Bartosz, gpio tree or the rockchip tree for patches 1+2? ;-)
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists