linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] platform/mellanox: mlxbf-tmfifo: Fix a memory barrier issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 7 May 2021 20:30:12 -0400
From:   Liming Sun <limings@...dia.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>
CC:     Liming Sun <limings@...dia.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] platform/mellanox: mlxbf-tmfifo: Fix a memory barrier issue

The virtio framework uses wmb() when updating avail->idx. It
guarantees the write order, but not necessarily loading order
for the code accessing the memory. This commit adds a load barrier
after reading the avail->idx to make sure all the data in the
descriptor is visible. It also adds a barrier when returning the
packet to virtio framework to make sure read/writes are visible to
the virtio code.

Fixes: 1357dfd7261f ("platform/mellanox: Add TmFifo driver for Mellanox BlueField Soc")
Signed-off-by: Liming Sun <limings@...dia.com>
---
v1->v2:
  Updates for Vadim's comments:
  - Add the 'Fixes' field in the commit message.
v1: Initial version
---
 drivers/platform/mellanox/mlxbf-tmfifo.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/mellanox/mlxbf-tmfifo.c b/drivers/platform/mellanox/mlxbf-tmfifo.c
index bbc4e71..38800e8 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/mellanox/mlxbf-tmfifo.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/mellanox/mlxbf-tmfifo.c
@@ -294,6 +294,9 @@ static irqreturn_t mlxbf_tmfifo_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
 	if (vring->next_avail == virtio16_to_cpu(vdev, vr->avail->idx))
 		return NULL;
 
+	/* Make sure 'avail->idx' is visible already. */
+	virtio_rmb(false);
+
 	idx = vring->next_avail % vr->num;
 	head = virtio16_to_cpu(vdev, vr->avail->ring[idx]);
 	if (WARN_ON(head >= vr->num))
@@ -322,7 +325,7 @@ static void mlxbf_tmfifo_release_desc(struct mlxbf_tmfifo_vring *vring,
 	 * done or not. Add a memory barrier here to make sure the update above
 	 * completes before updating the idx.
 	 */
-	mb();
+	virtio_mb(false);
 	vr->used->idx = cpu_to_virtio16(vdev, vr_idx + 1);
 }
 
@@ -733,6 +736,12 @@ static bool mlxbf_tmfifo_rxtx_one_desc(struct mlxbf_tmfifo_vring *vring,
 		desc = NULL;
 		fifo->vring[is_rx] = NULL;
 
+		/*
+		 * Make sure the load/store are in order before
+		 * returning back to virtio.
+		 */
+		virtio_mb(false);
+
 		/* Notify upper layer that packet is done. */
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&fifo->spin_lock[is_rx], flags);
 		vring_interrupt(0, vring->vq);
-- 
1.8.3.1