linux-kernel - [PATCH] tty: nozomi: Fix a resource leak in an error handling function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun,  9 May 2021 19:22:33 +0200
From:   Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stefani@...bold.net
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] tty: nozomi: Fix a resource leak in an error handling function

A 'request_irq()' call is not balanced by a corresponding 'free_irq()' in
the error handling path, as already done in the remove function.

Add it.

Fixes: 9842c38e9176 ("kfifo: fix warn_unused_result")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
---
I also wonder if the loop above is correct. The 'i < MAX_PORT' looks really
spurious to me.
'tty_port_destroy' can be called twice for the same entry (once before
branching in the error handling path, and once in here) and
'tty_unregister_device'/'tty_port_destroy' will be called on entries
that have not been 'tty_port_init'ed or 'tty_port_register_device'd.
I don't know if it may be an issue.
---
 drivers/tty/nozomi.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/nozomi.c b/drivers/tty/nozomi.c
index 9a2d78ace49b..b270e137ef9b 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/nozomi.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/nozomi.c
@@ -1420,6 +1420,7 @@ static int nozomi_card_init(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 		tty_unregister_device(ntty_driver, dc->index_start + i);
 		tty_port_destroy(&dc->port[i].port);
 	}
+	free_irq(pdev->irq, dc);
 err_free_kfifo:
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_PORT; i++)
 		kfifo_free(&dc->port[i].fifo_ul);
-- 
2.30.2